Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;3:CD005326

O'donnell S, Cranney A, Wells G, Adachi J, Reginster J.

Strontium ranelate is a new anti-osteoporosis therapy therefore, its benefits and harms need to be known. Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Search Strategy: We searched MEDLINE (1996 to March 2005), EMBASE (1996 to week 9 2005), the Cochrane Library (1996 to Issue 1 2005), reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings from the last two years. Additional data was sought from authors and industry sponsors. Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least one year duration comparing strontium ranelate versus placebo reporting fracture incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), health related quality of life and/or safety outcomes in postmenopausal women. Treatment (versus prevention) population was defined as women with prevalent vertebral fractures and/or lumbar spine BMD T score < -2.5 SD. Data Collection And Analysis: Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, assessed trial quality and extracted the relevant data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RCTs were grouped by dose of strontium ranelate and treatment duration. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model. Main Results: A total of four trials met our inclusion criteria, three of which investigated the effects of strontium ranelate compared to placebo in a treatment population (doses ranged from 0.5 to 2 g daily) and one, in a prevention population (doses 0.125, 0.5 and 1 g daily). In osteoporotic, postmenopausal women a 37% reduction in vertebral fractures (two trials, n = 5082, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.71) and a 14% reduction in non-vertebral fractures (two trials, n = 6572, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98) was demonstrated over a three year period with 2 g of strontium ranelate daily. An increase in BMD at all sites was shown with the same dose: lumbar spine BMD (two trials, n = 1614, WMD adjusted for strontium content 5.44, 95% CI 3.41 to 7.46 and WMD not adjusted 11.29, 95% CI 10.22 to 12.37 over two years), femoral neck and total hip (two trials, n = 4230, WMD 8.25, 95% CI 7.84 to 8.66 and WMD 9.83, 95% CI 9.39 to 10.26 respectively over three years). One gram of strontium ranelate daily in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis increased BMD at all sites over a two year period: lumbar spine (one trial, n = 59, WMD adjusted for strontium content 2.39, 95% CI 0.15 to 4.63 and WMD not adjusted 6.68, 95% CI 5.16 to 8.20), femoral neck (one trial, n= 60, WMD 2.52, 95%CI 0.96 to 4.09) and total hip (one trial, n = 60, WMD 1.02, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.56). In both the treatment and prevention populations, lower doses of strontium ranelate were superior to placebo with the highest dose of strontium ranelate demonstrating the greatest reduction in vertebral fractures and increase in BMD. There is some evidence to suggest that 2 g of strontium ranelate daily compared to placebo may have a beneficial effect on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women after three years of treatment. Two grams of strontium ranelate daily increased the risk of diarrhea (RR 1.38%, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.87); however, adverse events did not affect the risk of discontinuing strontium ranelate nor did it increase the risk of serious side effects, gastritis or death. Additional data obtained suggests that the risk of vascular system disorders including venous thromboembolism (two trials, n = 6669, 2.2% versus 1.5%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.1) and pulmonary embolism (two trials, n = 6669, 0.8% versus 0.4%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.1) as well as nervous system disorders such as headaches (3.9% versus 2.9%), seizures (0.3% versus 0.1%), memory loss (2.4% versus 1.9%) and disturbance in consciousness (2.5% versus 2.0%) is slightly increased with taking 2 g of strontium ranelate daily over a 3 to 4 year period. Conclusions: There is silver level evidence to support the efficacy of strontium ranelate for the reduction of vertebral fractures (and to a lesser extent non-vertebral fractures) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and an increase in BMD (all sites) in postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis. Diarrhea may occur however, adverse events leading to study withdrawal were not significantly increased in the strontium ranelate group. Potential risks to the vascular and neurological system associated with taking 2 g of strontium ranelate daily need to be further explored and quantified.

J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Apr;21(4):536-42. Epub 2006 Apr 5

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is independent of baseline risk factors.

Roux C, Reginster JY, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, Sawicki A, Tulassay Z, Luisetto G, Padrino JM, Doyle D, Prince R, Fardellone P, Sorensen OH, Meunier PJ.

Universite Paris-Descartes, Faculte de Medecine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Strontium ranelate (2 g/day) was studied in 5082 postmenopausal women. A reduction in incident vertebral fracture risk by 40% was shown after 3 years. This effect was independent of age, initial BMD, and prevalent vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: Strontium ranelate is an orally active treatment able to decrease the risk of vertebral and hip fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strontium ranelate according to the main determinants of vertebral fracture risk: age, baseline BMD, prevalent fractures, family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We pooled data of two large multinational randomized double-blind studies with a population of 5082 (2536 receiving strontium ranelate 2 g/day and 2546 receiving a placebo), 74 years of age on average, and a 3-year follow-up. An intention-to-treat principle was used, as well as a Cox model for comparison and relative risks. RESULTS: The treatment decreased the risk of both vertebral (relative risk [RR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.69] p < 0.001) and nonvertebral (RR = 0.85 [0.74-0.99] p = 0.03) fractures. The decrease in risk of vertebral fractures was 37% (p = 0.003) in women <70 years, 42% (p < 0.001) for those 70-80 years of age, and 32% (p = 0.013) for those >/=80 years. The RR of vertebral fracture was 0.28 (0.07-0.99) in osteopenic and 0.61 (0.53-0.70) in osteoporotic women, and baseline BMD was not a determinant of efficacy. The incidence of vertebral fractures in the placebo group increased with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures, but this was not a determinant of the effect of strontium ranelate. In 2605 patients, the risk of experiencing a first vertebral fracture was reduced by 48% (p < 0.001). The risk of experiencing a second vertebral fracture was reduced by 45% (p < 0.001; 1100 patients). Moreover, the risk of experiencing more than two vertebral fractures was reduced by 33% (p < 0.001; 1365 patients). Family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking were not determinants of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a 3-year treatment with strontium ranelate leads to antivertebral fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women independently of baseline osteoporotic risk factors.

Drugs Today (Barc). 2006 Jun;42(6):355-67

Gennari L.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally different compounds that interact with intracellular estrogen receptors in target organs as estrogen agonists and antagonists. Thus far SERMs have proven to be a highly versatile group and are being evaluated primarily for conditions associated with aging, including hormone-responsive cancer and osteoporosis. Tamoxifen and toremifene are currently used to treat advanced breast cancer and also have beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene is the only SERM compound actually approved worldwide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Unfortunately, although these SERMs possess many benefits, they are also responsible for some very serious side effects, such as thromboembolic disorders and, in the case of tamoxifen, uterine cancer. These contraindications represent a major concern for the type of long-term, chronic therapy that is required to prevent osteoporosis. Moreover, both preclinical and clinical reports suggest that these SERMs are considerably less potent than estrogen, probably due to their reduced bioavailability. Lasofoxifene (CP 336,156) is a naphthalene-derivative, third-generation SERM, structurally distinct from the first- and second-generation SERMs. This compound selectively binds to both estrogen receptor subtypes (estrogen receptor-alpha or -beta) with high affinity. It has a half-inhibition concentration similar to that seen with estradiol and thus at least 10-fold higher than those reported for raloxifene and tamoxifen. Moreover, due to increased resistance to intestinal wall glucuronidation, lasofoxifene has a remarkably improved oral bioavailability with respect to other SERMs. In both preclinical and short-term clinical studies lasofoxifene has shown a proven efficacy in preventing bone loss and lowering cholesterol levels. Dose modeling from phase II studies allowed the selection of lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day as the lowest fully effective dose. The compound shows a favorable safety profile and is currently in phase III development for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May 25;54(6):1838-1846 [Epub ahead of print]

Delmas PD, Adami S, Strugala C, Stakkestad JA, Reginster JY, Felsenberg D, Christiansen C, Civitelli R, Drezner MK, Recker RR, Bolognese M, Hughes C, Masanauskaite D, Ward P, Sambrook P, Reid DM.

OBJECTIVE: Although oral bisphosphonates are effective treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, oral dosing may be unsuitable for some patients. An efficacious intravenously administered bisphosphonate could be beneficial for such patients. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered using extended dosing intervals, either orally or by rapid intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal intravenous dosing regimen for ibandronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III, noninferiority study, we compared 2 regimens of intermittent intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months and 3 mg every 3 months) with a regimen of 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily, the latter of which has proven antifracture efficacy. The study group comprised 1,395 women (ages 55-80 years) who were at least 5 years postmenopausal. All patients had osteoporosis (lumbar spine [L2-L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T score less than -2.5). Participants also received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). The primary end point was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year. Changes in hip BMD and in the level of serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were also measured, as were safety and tolerability. RESULTS: At 1 year, mean lumbar spine BMD increases were as follows: 5.1% among 353 patients receiving 2 mg of ibandronate every 2 months, 4.8% among 365 patients receiving 3 mg of ibandronate every 3 months, and 3.8% among 377 patients receiving 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily. Both of the intravenous regimens not only were noninferior, but also were superior (P < 0.001) to the oral regimen. Hip BMD increases (at all sites) were also greater in the groups receiving medication intravenously than in the group receiving ibandronate orally. Robust decreases in the serum CTX level were observed in all arms of the study. Both of the intravenous regimens were well tolerated and did not compromise renal function. CONCLUSION: As assessed by BMD, intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months or 3 mg every 3 months) are at least as effective as the regimen of 2.5 mg orally daily, which has proven antifracture efficacy, and are well tolerated.

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Apr;22(4):179-184

Garcia-Perez MA, Moreno-Mercer J, Tarin JJ, Cano A.

Objectives. To investigate the effects of a low transdermal estradiol dose on bone metabolism and to compare it with both the standard dose and absence of treatment.Methods. In this study performed in a third-level academic center, 66 healthy postmenopausal women underwent hormone therapy (HT) with patches containing estradiol at standard (0.050 mg/day, HT50, 33 women) or low dosage (0.025 mg/day, HT25, 33 women) and 70 women were without treatment (NT). The values (mean of three samples) of several bone biochemical parameters were compared between groups after adjusting for confounding factors. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) in the spine and hip in all cases, and a second densitometry scan was performed in 44 women.Results. Bone turnover markers tended to show lower values in the treated groups, but significance was restricted to total alkaline phosphatase (NT vs. HT25, p &lt; 0.05) and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) (NT vs. HT25, p &lt; 10(-6); NT vs. HT50, p &lt; 10(-5)). The loss of BMD observed in NT women, as assessed by the annual percentage change, was blocked in both the HT25 and HT50 women. No significant differences were detected between both HT groups.Conclusions. Low and standard dosages of transdermal estradiol were equally effective in controlling bone metabolism, as assessed by turnover markers. Additionally, NTX was confirmed as the most sensitive marker for detecting changes in bone resorption.

Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006 Feb;8(1):50-4.

Hamdy NA.

The discovery and characterization of the RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling pathway and the identification of its role in the pathogenesis of bone loss have provided the rationale for the development of drugs with the ability to modulate RANK-induced osteoclastogenesis. In vivo studies have identified interfering with the RANKL/RANK interaction as a potential therapeutic target in the management of osteoporosis. Two agents capable of blocking the binding of RANKL to RANK have been so far tested in clinical studies--osteoprotegerin (Fc-OPG fusion molecule) and the RANKL-antibody (AMG 162). Both have been found to have profound inhibitory effects on bone resorption, with AMG 162 appearing to be overall superior to OPG. Data are still very scarce, however, and much remains to be uncovered before novel strategies capable of modulating the RANKL/OPG signaling pathway could be safely and effectively used in the management of osteoporosis.

Menopause. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):148-55

Richman S, Edusa V, Fadiel A, Naftolin F.

The risks of low bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fractures, are major concerns in postmenopausal women. Although postmenopausal hormone therapy is effective for reducing these risks, safety issues have been raised by the results of studies such as the Women's Health Initiative. Although there are scientifically valid reasons to be wary of the general applicability of the Women's Health Initiative findings, the study has underscored the continuing need for research into new forms of menopausal hormone therapy. Low-dose transdermal estrogen monotherapy can preserve bone density while relieving vasomotor symptoms. Transdermal administration may offer advantages, including lack of first-pass liver metabolism, which permits the use of lower doses and avoids a negative impact on the lipid profile. Moreover, a recently published 2-year study of ultra-low-dose transdermal estrogen monotherapy in an older population similar to that of the WHI reported significant increases in bone mineral density, accompanied by significant reductions in markers of bone turnover, with no increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia or other side effects. Additional studies are warranted to shed further light on the possible benefits of low-dose estrogen monotherapy for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.

OSTEOPOROSIS:  RANELATO DE ESTRONCIO, ¿CÓMO VAMOS? ¿CUANTO SE VA A RECETAR?

El ranelato de estroncio, acumula evidencia de eficacia para tratar osteoporosis y prevenir fracturas  en magnitud de -37%  en  vertebras y   -14% en no vertebrales. Las dosis de menos de 1 gramo son menos eficaces y sobre 2 g al día pierden ventaja al aparecer mas diarrea y tendencia a trombosis venosa profunda, pero no mas embolías pulmonares, comparados con placebo. Estos resultados representan un promedio de tres años de observación en tratamiento diario. Las trombosis en este grupo no son sorpresa pues han sido ya reportados y el mecanismo es incierto. Parece que el estroncio, al igual que otros cationes afecta los canales de calcio plaquetarios.

MAS DE OSTEOPOROSIS: LASOFOXIFENO

Lasofoxifeno, un SERM que se quiere comparar con Raloxifeno, ya tiene dosis mínima útil, que es de 0.25 mg/día. Su futura esperanza de ventajas se basa en su mejor absorción digestiva y en una mayor afinidad con receptores de estrógenos tanto alfa como beta, comparado con raloxifeno y tamoxifeno. Otros  ya quedaron en el camino por exceso de acción a nivel genital. Veremos que pasa en los estudios fase III, en curso.